.asm16 jmp dword ptr[0]

stool: Invalid instructions, impossible to assemble this code

.asm16 jmp far [sp-2]

stool: Invalid instructions, impossible to assemble this code

.asm16 push ax

.asm16 jmp [sp-2]

You killed him.

lol

:/
.asm16 push eax

stool: 6650

.asm16 push ax

stool: 50

.asm16 mov ax, [esp+10h]

stool: 678B442410

.asm jmp short 7h

stool: Invalid instructions, impossible to assemble this code

.dasm EB09

stool:
-------------------------------------------------
00000000 EB09 jmp short 0xb

.dasm16 EB09

-------------------------------------------------
stool:
-------------------------------------------------
00000000 EB09 jmp short 0xb
-------------------------------------------------

.dasm16 EB05

stool:
-------------------------------------------------
00000000 EB05 jmp short 0x7
-------------------------------------------------

Hi, anyone got tips of any dissassemlbers for win32, P-code
?

Softice
Or IDA-Pro

IDA is da best

http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/lREIcX20.html <--why version 1) only works..?

stool: ssc and rip were already assigned
the data on the stack doesn't move when you push
or pop

well it should sub to esp
so i'm indexing it manually there but somehow it won't add up

no it shouldn't

it shouldnt?

ssc = esp+index; sub esp, 2 // ssc still correctly contains the address of the data of interest

in a 32bit flat model, it subtracts esp by 4 when you push eax

and?
so you need to adjust your references on the stack
AFTER the push
mov edx, esp; push eax; mov ecx, esp+04h;; cmp edx, ecx = true

hmm

Well, you can't "mov ecx, esp + anything" .. but his point stands

of course.
we had a weird bug at work today.. where if (0 > 5) succeeded

This is driving me crazy
the references there dont use bp, prior to the interrupt call there is one paramenter been pushed into stack.
all of the reference there is used after the all the pushes

That is a weird bug

<EwIck-> ssc = esp+index; sub esp, 2 // ssc still correctly contains the address of the data of interest <-- i fail to understand this.. if index was 2 the ssc would of be 2 bytes short, after sub esp, 2..

x = 2
y = x
x = x -2
has y changed?
n.
no.

erm i think you got it all wrong, after sub esp, 2 .... mov [ssc], ax would be equal to mov[ esp+index ], but esp has changed

sure. I'm wrong, you're right and yet your code does not work

@ssc equ esp+08h, your telling me that the assembler magically replaces esp for some magical value that points to the same index even if esp is changed? heh.

Heh
No, but what happens is that "ssc" gets turned into "esp+08h" by the pre-processor

it's a macro?

It's an equate

duh

Like #define in C

what assembler is that anyway
that's what I asked
it's a macro.

Alright
I didn't look at the code, just the one line he pasted
If it's a macro, then it's probably bad and should be using EBP instead if the function has a stack frame set up

masm, equ is like a macro

right, but it's evaluated only once

im spesha

woot. pay just got deposited

mine hasnt :<

two more paychecks and I'll have enough to buy you.

me?

you or your "husband", I can settle for either

im exspensive

I'm a cheap drunk. Buy me pear cider and we'll talk

why do you use ""

You know the difference between a straight man and a gay man?
About 5 beers

ew

make that 13
oh well. must sleep. work tomorrow
night

go to work for me too

night night

I have enough sh*t to deal with thank you
stupid moron at work keeps comitting code that's not even working

my job sucks worse.. i win

I mean.. it can happen, but when you miss a ; on one line and still commit to cvs without even compiling your sh*t first...
you know
bastard.

Yeah, yeah. It's my fault

Its always your fault TCA

Why you all gotta be pickin on me.

Your the person to turn too when things go wrong ofcourse :D

Yeah.
Except for one thing.
It's good to be the king.

King of the one man kingdom aye aye.

Looks like a 26 man/bot kingdom to me

bots dont count :)

I dunno
.kick stool They do my bidding, too

(Action) fondles the TCA

sorry, i need to let out some agony with this code somehow :|

Go ahead
Beat me up.

Still wont feel good mentally beating someone up, think i need to watch some tv heh heh.

It wouldn't be any fun mentally beating me up anyway. I'd not be paying attention. And that would just make you pathetic.

That would be a Bor0 :P
I think this bochs has to do with bochs not me, going to boot my machine and test it.
er
i mean this problem

hello

Any luck, stool?

no :(

Oh well, the world needs ditch diggers, too

i wish bochs is more debugging friendly then just an emulator
i've been referencing the parameters the same way for about ole hundreds of functions now, i just dont know why 16bit mode is screwing me up.
Even with using a prolog, bp-index is not working either.
I just don't understand.. god dammnit
I mean on interrupts it should push in cs:ip (4 bytes) into stack. Or perhaps I'm wrong..

hello humans

http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/P5nhlk51.html <-- this is screwed up, 1) does not work, 2) works
it is screwed up all to gether that i the index at @RIP is esp+4h to begin with, since push ax, should only subtract esp by 2, thus should be at esp+2h
02.32 <stool> Even with using a prolog, bp-index is not working either. <--- i mean bp+index not minus
(Action) screams
.dasm16 50678B44240833D22EF7361800428ACA33D22EF7361A00C1E2088AE858CA02

stool:
-------------------------------------------------
00000000 50 push ax
00000001 678B442408 mov ax,[esp+0x8]
00000006 33D2 xor dx,dx
00000008 2EF7361800 div word [cs:0x18]
0000000D 42 inc dx
0000000E 8ACA mov cl,dl